🎓 PhD Students: 15% off — use code PHDFIRST  ·  📧 Free assessment: review@meritpeer.com
Ethics & Accreditations

Our Ethical Standards
Built on COPE, GDPR, and ICMJE Principles

Accreditations & Compliance Framework

Our Commitments

Ethics Is Not a Feature — It Is Our Foundation

MeritPeer operates in the intersection of academic publishing and researcher trust. Our ethical framework is built on the same principles that govern the world's most respected journals and publishing bodies.

📘

COPE-Aligned Practices

MeritPeer operates in full alignment with the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines for pre-publication advisory services. We do not ghostwrite, fabricate data, or engage in any form of academic misconduct.

COPE Guidelines Aligned
🔒

GDPR Compliant

We are fully compliant with UK and EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). All personal data is processed lawfully, transparently, and with purpose limitation. Data subjects have full rights of access, rectification, and erasure.

UK & EU GDPR Compliant
📋

ICMJE Consistent

Our service model is consistent with International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) guidelines on the use of professional writing and editing assistance, which explicitly permits advisory peer review services.

ICMJE Consistent
🔐

ISO 27001 Principles

Our data handling and security practices align with ISO 27001 information security principles: encryption, access control, incident response, and documented data retention policies.

ISO 27001 Principles

NDA Protocol

Every reviewer signs a per-manuscript non-disclosure agreement — legally binding, with financial and professional liability clauses. No blanket agreements. Every NDA is manuscript-specific.

Per-Manuscript NDA
🌐

WCAG 2.1 Accessibility

Our website is built to WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility standards: semantic HTML, keyboard navigation, screen reader compatibility, colour contrast compliance, and skip navigation links.

WCAG 2.1 AA Compliant
Ethical Publishing Statement

What MeritPeer Is — and Is Not

Pre-submission peer review is a legitimate, ethical, and widely practised form of academic support. It is no different in principle from a supervisor reading a student's manuscript, a colleague providing feedback, or a statistician checking an analysis.

What MeritPeer does: reviews, advises, identifies weaknesses, and suggests improvements.
What MeritPeer never does: ghostwrite, fabricate, falsify, or misrepresent research.

Advisory feedback — always transparent to co-authors and institutions
Reviewer identities never disclosed — full blind review process
Manuscripts deleted within 15 days of delivery — no data retention
Zero tolerance for contract cheating — reported immediately

Questions About Our Ethics?

Contact our team — we respond to every ethics or compliance inquiry within 24 hours.

Contact Us →
Get Free Quote